We hold the world in our hands

I’ve been involved in environment, social change or peace groups for nearly 30 years and I certainly can’t remember facing such large scale challenges. I first became seriously involved with social change in 1983 during the nuclear arms build up of the Reagan and Andropov years. The USA was making statements suggesting that in the event of nuclear war they wanted to ensure that they could “prevail and be able to force the Soviet Union to seek earliest termination of hostilities on terms favourable to the United States”  (Arms Control Association). We interpreted this to mean that US policy makers thought a nuclear war could be winnable and were moving away from the policy of Mutually Assured Destruction (the idea that nobody would launch a nuclear attack because it would lead to their own destruction as well).

For the first time, it seemed that large scale nuclear war was a real possibility and that we faced the threat of a nuclear winter and mass nuclear destruction.

We now find ourselves in a very different situation. While the consequences of nuclear war were terrible, preventing them was relatively easy: we just needed to prevent nuclear war. (And I think it is worth pointing out that we were successful in doing so!)  Now, although the consequences of climate change are unlikely to be as dramatic as nuclear winter, to prevent it we need to take proactive action rather than preventive action.

As a community we had little to gain from the nuclear arms race – except for the businesses that were making millions of dollars from the arms build up – and preventing nuclear war did not require large scale changes to how people lived. Unfortunately many people (particularly in the overdeveloped nations) are benefiting from the things that contribute to climate change and millions of people are going to have to change their lifestyles if we are to reduce the impact of climate change.

We face greater opposition now than in the 1980s because more people are threatened by the changes we need to make.  As an aside, in the 1980s we were regularly labelled as being communists or Soviet stooges (because we did things like pointed out that the USA was the only country to have used nuclear weapons in war). We are no longer called pro Russian but are seen as being anti-free-market. You know, this time I’m actually quite happy to wear the label; I am quite prepared to say that I believe that capitalism and the free-market are unable to fix the situation we find ourselves in.

We also need to address the uneven distribution of resources where the life style of those of us in overdeveloped nations is dependent on the exploitation and suffering of millions of people in underdeveloped nations. I am amazed at how we (and I very much included myself in this) can continue to live our luxurious lives and ignore the fact that millions of people live in extreme poverty.  Once again, addressing this imbalance requires large scale social change.

We hold the future of the world in our hands and, even though I am essentially an optimist, I feel pretty bleak as we enter 2012. I fear the future we are leaving Jasmine and Alexa – and they face a much more positive future than the millions of people living in extreme poverty.  For the moment, I will continue to do what I can and hope that enough people decide to commit themselves to creating a more just and sustainable world.

About Graeme Stuart

Lecturer (Family Action Centre, Newcastle Uni), blogger (Sustaining Community), environmentalist, Alternatives to Violence Project facilitator, father. Passionate about families, community development, peace & sustainability.
This entry was posted in Environmental sustainability, Personal and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to We hold the world in our hands

  1. I’ve shared your deep pessimism in the past Graeme.

    For a while Transition offered me hope but when I saw how small the take-up was, particularly in Australia, I lost faith in it to do anything other than provide life boats for those who managed to get their community organised early enough.

    Occupy has been providing me with a level of hope that I find surprising to myself. Perhaps I’m in a simiar honeymoon phase as I was when I first came across Transition, but only time will tell.

    I think the two work well together and complement each other.

    I’m actually looking forward to 2012. It only seems onward and upward from here, and as I see the Occupy movement grow and consolidate and mature globally and in Australia my hope only seems to be growing along with it, and that’s a small miracle for me.

    Like

    • Graeme says:

      Great to hear Sean. I don’t think Occupy is very big in Newcastle. I presume Occupy is creating a vision of what they want as well as being a voice against the things wrong in society.

      Like

      • Occupy isn’t only creating a vision, we are actually building a new society from the ground up. You won’t see that on the news and it’s a bit to hard to explain how it’s happening, but it’s pretty exciting.

        Like

I'd love to hear what you think!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s